Menu
  • Home
  • Akce
  • Jednotka SDH
  • Mladí hasiči
    • Rok 2020
    • Rok 2019
    • Rok 2018
    • Rok 2017
    • Rok 2016
    • Rok 2015
    • Rok 2014
  • Fotogalerie
  • Kontakt
  • Home
  • Akce
  • Jednotka SDH
  • Mladí hasiči
    • Rok 2020
    • Rok 2019
    • Rok 2018
    • Rok 2017
    • Rok 2016
    • Rok 2015
    • Rok 2014
  • Fotogalerie
  • Kontakt

270 vs 308 for elk


By | 26.12.2020 | Category Nezařazené

Remington made a great cartridge in the 280, but really botched the rollout and the cartridge has never recovered. As we have discussed throughout this article, the choice really comes down to you and your purpose that you have in mind as you choose between these two different rounds. Also, many of these hunters have the luxury of a long seas… Recovery of the animal is a must. 6.5cm is flatter shooting and ammo cost about the same. Gilding metal (90 percent copper, 10 percent zinc) was first thought too soft for the friction generated by 150-grain bullets in .30-06 service ammunition. Since the .308 Winchester is essentially a scaled down .30-06, with the exception of recoil (which we’ll get to in a minute) the .270 Winchester has the same advantages over the .308 as it does over the .30-06. The .308 Winchester has the edge with these particular 150 grain loads, but there are also instances where certain 150 grain .270 Winchester loads have the edge in terms of trajectory, retained energy, and wind drift. Find a tough cartridge for one of the most prized and toughest hooved big game animals around. While each cartridge offers certain benefits to hunters, there is also a pretty big overlap in their capabilities. Vicious-Peanut, Mar 18, 2010 Momentum (not KE) is king when it comes to penetration, and heavier bullets retain it better than lighter bullets. As you can see, these cartridges are fairly similar. With good shot placement and when using quality bullets, the .270 Winchester and .308 Winchester are ideally suited for hunting medium to large sized game. Simple fact is with a premium bullet both the 270 and 7mm-08 are perfectly adequate given good shot placement. The .308 commonly has a 150 to 180 grain range. Something important to know when comparing the .270 vs .308 is that the .308 has seen a lot of military service, while the .270 is primarily a hunting round. Prices and availability vary from region to region, but ammunition for both cartridges is widely available. The US Army began the search for a new rifle and cartridge after receiving a deadly demonstration of the capabilities of the revolutionary new Mauser rifle and 7mm Mauser cartridge in the hands of Spanish troops in Cuba during 1898. Do you hunt in areas where it might be necessary to take a longer range shot? The .270 Winchester commonly has weights from 130 to 160 grains, depending on what your intended use is. The .270 Win has a muzzle energy of around 3000 foot pounds, meaning that it has this much energy when the bullet exits the muzzle of the barrel. A 270 in 130 gr suffers the same shortcoming. How ever living on the east coast most shots are very short and there for would go with a 444 marlin, when shooting within 200 yd do not want a bullet that will travel miles. The Best Rifle Scopes, Optics & Accessories, .308 vs .270 – Backgrounds for each Cartridge. If you’d like to see how the .270 Winchester compares to its parent case in the .30-06, read the article below: 270 vs 30-06 Debate Settled Once And For All. Additionally, Winchester recognized serious commercial potential with the 7.62x51mm cartridge and introduced the extremely similar .308 Winchester cartridge for the civilian hunting and shooting markets in the 1950s. Do you primarily hunt deer sized game (including black bear) at ranges less than 200 yards? We’ll start with the .308 Winchester. Shot placement is the important thing. If you are looking for a semi-automatic weapon, the .308 would probably be your best choice. This helps support the blog and allows me to continue to create free content that’s useful to hunters like yourself. There are places where .22 centerfires are legal for elk. Both cartridges will work, but the .308 Winchester is probably the better choice in this case since it uses larger diameter and heavier bullets that are well suited for very large or tough animals. However, that makes sense when you consider that the .308 and .270 were designed as lower recoiling alternatives to the .30-06. Both the .270 and 7mm mag. 150 grain, 165 grain, 168 grain, and 180 grain bullets are most popular for that cartridge. On the other hand, the .308 Winchester is relatively common in semi-automatic sporting rifles like the AR-10 and M1A. Remember that generally the .308 is going to hit a bit harder because of the size of the bullet. By the same token, the .270 has taken untold numbers of moose, elk and plains game without any issues. Updated: May 10, 2019. I have always been a believer in heavier bullets regardless of the difference in drift because of lower BCs with heavy’s. While this might not actually be deserved, it is not nearly as common to run across a .308 in the field. Take the old and lame .308. In fact, a 150gr .270 has better sectional density than 180gr .308. For the purposes of this article, we will go out to 500 yards, so at 500 yards, the .270 Winchester has a speed of around 2085 feet per second. In 6.5mm this is a fairly heavy-for-caliber bullet that will penetrate well on game, but it’s still 140 grains. The table below compares the recoil produced by 130gr and 150gr .270 loads to 150gr and 180gr .308 loads (all shooting a Nosler Partition bullet) when fired from a Ruger American rifle. They formally released the resulting .270 Winchester cartridge in 1925 with the Winchester Model 54 rifle. For that reason, users of the .308 Winchester benefit from the extensive the research and development that has gone into refining .308″ bullets and rifles for long range shooting in the United States over the last century. While the differences between them (.270 vs 308) are pretty significant in some respects, they’re both acceptable for a wide range of hunting tasks. My solution to this dilemma was to have one of each, (I actually have 2 .308s) in addition to the .30-06. Not much mentioned about Ft-lbs of energy. Buy an excellent .308 Winchester hunting rifle here. Species not Browm Bear I firmly believe that shot placement and the correct choice of ammunition plays a great role in all hunts know your rifles capability and your own limitations to insure humane kills respect the animals God has blessed us with to provide awesome meals for our families take great shots be patient teach the next generation about safety and our hunting tradition choose a rifle that your comfortable firing we are hunters not snipers respect our wildlife make great decisions clean humane kills with correct ammo for the animals you hunt, The 6.8 SPC is another mass produced, commercially available .277 caliber cartridge. This data is for Federal factory ammo using a 200 yard zero. You can see that the .270 is a much longer and skinnier cartridge than the .308. I use the Federal premium cartridges with the Sierra 150gr gameking bullets and have never lost an animal. But I’d opt for something of stouter construction for a 130 gr 270, which means a bit more expensive. This can cause excess barrel wear and damage. Especially with the great bullets we have available today the .270 is just fine for elk…but I remain convinced that the .30-06 is better for elk, and certainly better for moose and bear. Though the 7.62x51mm NATO had a very short lived career as the primary rifle cartridge for the US military, it’s still widely used by the military in machineguns and sniper/designated marksman rifles. Though only a few cartridges use .277″ bullets, the .270 is extremely popular and there’s a plethora of quality bullets to choose from. They’re both about the same up to 150 gr bullets, but 160 and 175 gr bullets are easily obtained for 280R, and in a wide variety of cartridge and bullet makers. Copyright © 2020 Big Game Hunting Adventures LLC | All Rights Reserved, 7mm REM MAG vs 300 WIN MAG: WHAT YOU KNOW MAY BE WRONG, Best Gun Cleaning Kit For Hunters And Shooters In 2020, 450 Bushmaster vs 458 SOCOM vs 50 Beowulf: Battle Of The Big Bore AR Cartridges, https://thebiggamehuntingblog.com/270-vs-280-remington-vs-280-ackley-improved-vs-7mm-mag/, 6.5 Creedmoor vs 243 Winchester Review & Comparison, 6.5 Creedmoor vs 7mm-08 Remington Review & Comparison, 6.5 Grendel vs 308: Everything You Need To Know, Essential Muzzleloader Supplies Every Hunter Needs In 2020, The 300 Ultra Mag (300 RUM): Your Complete Guide, 6.8 SPC vs 6.5 Grendel: What You Need To Know, 6.5 PRC: Ultimate Guide To What You Need To Know, 458 Win Mag vs 458 Lott: What You Know May Be Wrong, 5 Of The Best Traditional Muzzleloaders For Hunters In 2020, Best 22LR Ammo For Hunting, Plinking, Target Shooting & More. By David E. Petzal. However, since most modern .30-06 factory loads have a small edge in velocity (usually around 100-200fps) over .308 factory loads shooting the same weight bullet, the advantage in velocity of the .270 Winchester is even more pronounced when compared to the .308. Let’s break down the differences in speed of travel and force of impact with the .270 vs .308. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc or its affiliates. So on my next elk hunt, I`ll be using perhaps what some consider to be a more un-conventional and unpopular bullet. I like the 308 over the 270, but if I needed a vary long shot I would go with the 300 win mag. The .270 Win is a very efficient round for most hunting, but, if I’m going for moose I want nothing less than the .30-06. It’s unclear exactly why Winchester opted for .277″ instead of the much more popular .284″ bullets. Regardless of their reasons though, the design team at Winchester went with that bullet diameter and the rest is history. Good luck in deciding between the 270, 30-06 or even the 300 WSM. My shots rarely exceeded 125 yards or so in the foothill country that I hunted in central Wyoming. my choice is the 270 win, shooting range for animals is most in the 200 yards. If you are looking for a semi-automatic weapon, the .308 would probably be your best choice. I prefer the Barnes TSX but to each his own. Though there is quite a bit of overlap in barrel lengths, .270 rifles often have slightly longer barrels than .308 rifles. In fact, I’d wager that they’re both among the Top 10 (if not the Top 5) best selling rifle cartridges in the United States each year. While recoil is more or less comparable between the two cartridges, typical .308 Winchester loads do not have as flat of a trajectory as typical .270 loads. Something important to know when comparing the .270 vs .308 is that the .308 has seen a lot of military service, while the .270 is primarily a hunting round. I have done BC calculations on Hornady website and a .308 shoots just as flat and with more energy than a .270 when you get up to 150 and 160 gr bullets for the .270. I think this is where we begin to make our biggest distinctions between the rounds. Still others consider the .270 worthless for elk hunting and recommend nothing less than a .300 Magnum as the absolute minimum elk cartridge. If you’d like to learn more about the evolution of intermediate cartridges, read the article below. The .270 Winchester vs. the 7mm Remington Magnum. There are a lot of factors to consider when buying your rifle, and we hope that this article has helped you to determine which round you want when it comes down to considering the .308 vs .270. One, lung-shot by a client with a .270, reared as might a horse then fell backward, … My current elk rifle is a 270 Win, just wondered if I would gain enough yardage to make the WSM worthwhile. Would be even happier with 168 Ballistic Tips, but couldn't find any before the season. The chart below compares how much a 10 mile per hour crosswind impacts those same four loads out to 500 yards.Once again we see that the .308 Winchester load outperforms the .270 Winchester when using 150gr bullets, but the 130gr .270 load has far less wind drift than either .308 load. As you can see in the photo below, the .270 Winchester and .308 Winchester cartridges have very different external dimensions. I also think the heaviest bullet for the .308 should be no more than 165 grains. The .308 Winchester and .270 Winchester are two of the most popular centerfire rifle cartridges in North America. I have two loads I use in the 270 Win. The .308 has around 2720 foot pounds and 1260 foot pounds at the same distances. Both are very common in bolt-action rifles. Occasionally elk have died more quickly than I expected. Each of these platforms allow the .308 to be used in a variety of different ways and for different purposes. Step up .013 inch and you have .277 inch, the bullet diameter of the .270 Winchester (and .270 WSM and Weatherby Magnum). The faster 150 grain bullets were tried for mule deer but I was disappointed with the significant meat damage. By Joseph von Benedikt. All cartridges/rifles are a balancing act between This is because the smaller diameter .270 Winchester shoots lighter bullets than the .308 and the .30-06. It has around 1450 at 500 yards. Note: while the case capacity figures listed below do give a good indication of the differences between the three cartridges, exact case capacities vary slightly according to the brand of brass used. The .270 Winchester would be a good example of this. All that being said, while the .308 probably has a slight edge here, both cartridges have the potential for excellent accuracy in the right hands. Especially when using a heavy bullet (180+ grains), the .308 has a significant advantage when hunting most plains game in Africa like blue wildebeest, kudu, and eland. The .308, as mentioned above, has some awesome man-stopping ability that has been proven through service in multiple wars, especially when using the. While many were satisfied with the .30-06 from the start, wildcatters also quickly started modifying the cartridge for more specialized tasks. Some gun designers necked up the .30-06 to develop bigger cartridges like the .35 Whelen and .400 Whelen. We’ll start with the .308 Winchester. In summary, I had very good luck with my .308 downing elk and a couple bears but it’s too powerful for common deer at typical distances hunting the forests and foothills. The original 7.62x51mm NATO M80 ball load fired a 146 grain full metal jacket (FMJ) bullet at 2,750 feet per second (2,469 foot pounds of muzzle energy). But if you are looking for a hunting rifle or something that you can go shoot at targets at long range, both of these rounds would be excellent choices. The Glenfield 30-30 is my main rifle for deer and wild hogs. GoShootGuns.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. Of these, 130 grain and 150 grain bullets are by far the most common. While the .30-06 performed very well during both world wars, the US Military again recognized the need for a new rifle and cartridge after World War II. As you can see, there is a significant difference in the bullet trajectories between the two cartridges. For other readers: you can see what Brian is talking about with regards to the 270 Winchester vs the 280 Remington at the link below. It is great for hunting big game such as moose and elk, although while talking about the .308 vs .270, the .270 is a formidable opponent. Sure, you can get away with it, especially with today’s extra-heavy bullets, but I think it’s foolish. Others consider it adequate, but not ideal. This fits with the original intent of the designers interested in building a mild shooting and easy to handle cartridge that was still powerful enough for hunting medium sized game at short to moderate range. These may be things that help you choose. This rifle accounted for several bulls and many cow elk; my longest shot was about 225 yards. Though some were reluctant to adopt the cartridge, many American hunters eventually came to appreciate the flat shooting characteristics of the round as well as the fact that it was so effective on thin skinned game. Deer, bear, moose, elk: they’ll all go down from a well placed 308 or 30-06. The .308 is absolutely enough gun for elk hunting. However, the 7.62x51mm achieved that performance with a much shorter case (51mm vs 63mm) due to advances in powder technology that occurred after the development of the .30-06. 6.5 Creedmoor. Both the 06 and 270 are quality choices. For target shooting, knock yourself out and take both to the range and have a ball. Introduced by Hornady in 2007, the 6.5 Creedmoor is easily the hottest-selling rifle … 2. recoil Get a nice hunting rifle chambered in the cartridge that you think fits your needs the best, learn to shoot it well, use quality bullets, and you’ll be well prepared for most common hunting situations. I think this is where we begin to make our biggest distinctions between the rounds. But Western Cartridge Company’s Lubaloy jacket, comprising 90 percent copper, 8 percent zinc and 2 percent … Aside from the Browning BAR, the .270 Winchester is almost non-existent in semi-automatic rifles. Let’s get down to it; the .308 vs .270. Folks who live in elk country may consciously seek a cow for the freezer. Providing approximately 90% of the power of the .30-06 in a smaller package, the cartridge soon became very popular and is now one of the most widely used big game hunting rounds in North America. Buy some great .308 Winchester hunting ammo here. Mag. The .308 Win, on the other hand, with a 168-grain bullet has a speed out of the muzzle of around 2700 feet per second and comes down to around 1840 at 500 yards. Are you just itching to take a rifle chambered in one of these cartridges on a hunt? Bullet selection becomes really important with a 150 grain pill fired out of a .308 intended for elk. Left to right: Winchester’s .270 is gentle in recoil but lethal. Splitting hairs with arguments like the age old “.308 vs .30-06” are pretty much a toss-up. Which Rifle is Better? Also considered rebarreling one of my 270's to a 270x300 Win Mag. I’m more than happy to shoot inexpensive bullets like Speer Grand Slam (180 gr and 175 grain, respectively) out of a 308 or 280 Rem. My open country load is a Sierra 130gr SPBT @ 2940 to 3000 fps depending on which rifle I have in my hands. The .270 Winchester has a significantly longer case length (2.54″ vs 2.015″) as well as overall length (3.34″ vs 2.81″). are great cartridges, but which one is better? I like the .270 for its flat shooting and hard hittting abilties over long range. In this hunter’s opinion, 175 gr 280 Rem and 180 gr 308W hit a sweet spot in bullet performance. This is only a preference, not a requirement for me. However, the .308 has a slightly steeper shoulder angle (20 degrees vs 17.5 degrees). Concealed Carry Class – Legal “Loophole” Allows You To Carry Concealed, Best Hunting Binoculars in 2018 You Can Buy, Best Ar-15 For The Money 2018 – Top 7 [NEW!!! Those same characteristics also make it a very good choice for mountain goat in Canada or Himalayan Tahr and chamois while hunting in New Zealand. The .270 was also commercially produced by Winchester, hence these two rounds being fairly similar but with some good differences as well. And even though the .270 is skinnier, its .5 inch increase in the casing length allows it to hold more powder and can withstand 3,000 more units of pressure than the .308. Not surprisingly, the .30-06 Springfield was an almost instant success in the civilian market. I started out hunting mule deer with a borrowed Winchester 30-30 and had very good luck with it. for longer range better go for the 7mm Rem Mag or 300 Win Mag/300 Wby Mag with 180gr. For elk, I`d feel comfortable with either one. G Fretwell Note: there is quite a bit of overlap with the performance of various 150 grain loads for both the .270 Winchester and .308 Winchester. On the other hand, even though the 180gr .308 bullet weighs more and has a slightly higher BC than the 130gr .270 bullet, the .270 has an additional 490fps of muzzle velocity that translates into a significantly flatter trajectory and less wind drift. Both have good success at longer distances as well. There are so many different calibers to choose from when it comes to a longer range rifle round. This round was originally brought to be in the form of the 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge, but Winchester commercially produced and sold it as the .308 Winchester. Thanks for your support. Instead of .284″ bullets like the 7mm Mauser (and more recently developed cartridges like the 7mm-08, .280 Remington, .280 Ackley Improved, and 7mm Remington Magnum), the .270 Winchester used .277″ bullets which undoubtedly hampered adoption of the cartridge to a certain degree. The 444 marlin puts a big hole in one side and out the other leaving a good blood trail if you have to track, but an animal hit with a 444 marlin mostly drops on the spot,or goes less than 25 – 50 yards. I live and have hunted in Colorado for more than 45 years with a .270. Therefore, I rule out using the .308 for moose because I think a 165 grain bullet is too light for an animal that size unless you have the velocity created by the .270 Win. Indeed, they’re both consistently among the most popular centerfire rifle cartridges used in the United States each year for good reason. Make sure you follow The Big Game Hunting Blog on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube. Some will argue that the 308 is better because heavier bullets are available. Though the .308 Winchester certainly has an edge over the .270 when shooting 150gr bullets, the 130gr .270 load has more energy remaining and shoots flatter (the .308 has 15-20″ more bullet drop) at 500 yards than both .308 Winchester loads. Buy a great .270 Winchester hunting rifle here. The .270 generally shoots flatter than the .308, which means that the bullet will drop less during its travel to the target. The relatively light recoil of the cartridge also makes it easier to handle in a lightweight rifle that’s desirable on a mountain hunt. Some hunters report that the .270 is a nearly ideal elk cartridge. While 2900 fps sounds cool and all, a high impact velocity means the bullet will almost certainly fragment on impact when using lower-end bullets. Virtually every major style of bullet is available in .270 and .308 as well like the Barnes TTSX, the Hornady ELD-X, GMX, InterBond, InterLock, SST, and V-Max, the Nosler AccuBond, AccuBond Long Range, Ballistic Tip, E-Tip, and Partition, the Remington Core Lokt, the Swift Scirocco and A-Frame, and the Winchester Power Point (just to name a few). The Big Game Hunting Blog is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.ca, Amazon.com.au, and other Amazon stores worldwide. Aside, I'm a 308 fan and this year's elk season will find me toting a 308 stoked with 165 Accubonds. Don’t get discouraged though: in today’s blog post, I’m going to discuss the pros and cons of the 270 vs 308 so you can make an informed decision on which one is best for you. Helped along by Jack O’Connor and the famous articles he wrote for Outdoor Life about the .270 over the years, the cartridge gradually caught on with the hunting community. Again, 270 is a fine cartridge, but whatever you shoot, you need to understand that cartridge’s limitations. Many western hunters annually take elk with 6mms and .25s. Ballistic data for the original 7.62x51mm military cartridge was obtained from Inetres. P.S. The .270 bullet is about 10% as big as the .308 Winchester with the same size casing that has been necked down to fit a .277 diameter bullet, but has been known to take down animals ranging from things smaller than Coyotes to animals like elk and moose. They are both incredibly effective (and popular) deer hunting cartridges and hunters armed with the .270 and .308 make up a significant portion of the annual whitetail deer harvest each year in the United States. On the other hand, since it shoots heavier and larger diameter bullets, the .308 Winchester has a clear advantage when hunting larger species moose, elk, and caribou. I think the majority of hunters and shooters would agree that the .270 Winchester and .308 Winchester are outstanding hunting cartridges. Using smokeless powder and a 150gr pointed bullet fired at a 2,700fps, the .30-06 Springfield was a gigantic improvement over other popular American cartridges used during that era like the .30-30 Winchester and the .45-70 Government. Interestingly enough, while the .270 Winchester eventually became a gigantic commercial success for the company, aside from the .270 Winchester Short Magnum (270 WSM), the .270 Weatherby Magnum, and the 6.8 Remington SPC, virtually no other mass produced cartridges use .277″ bullets. The .270 Winchester is a very flat shooting and moderately powerful cartridge, especially considering that it’s nearly 100 years old. After the Great War, cupro-nickel, of 60 percent copper and 40 percent nickel, became the jacket of choice. In fact, if a sporting goods store only carried ammo for three different centerfire rifle cartridges, I’d bet money they’d have .270, .308, and .30-06 ammo. Remember to keep in mind what kind of platform you would like to be shooting on, as your purpose will greatly affect this. On the other hand, the majority of .270 Winchester factory loads shoot bullets in the 120-150 grain range. The 270 vs 30-06 debate has gone on for about as long as the .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield have existed. Case capacities for the .270 Win and .308 Win were obtained from Nosler. Thanks Brian. https://thebiggamehuntingblog.com/270-vs-280-remington-vs-280-ackley-improved-vs-7mm-mag/, Great article both of these rounds are plenty capable of humanly killing most North American medium to large game The lighter 150-grain loads make a sound choice for deer and antelope hunters, and for those who want to take their .308 for heavier game like moose, elk and bear, there are a good number of 180- and 200-grain loads to choose from. The .270 Winchester has a significantly longer case length (2.54″ vs 2.015″) as well as overall length (3.34″ vs 2.81″). So I bought a Glenfield carbine in 30-30 and fitted it with a 2-7X scope. The .270 Winchester might be the better choice for you. My dark timber Elk load is … Around here, the .270 has a much better reputation for being a good all around choice ie; antelope, deer, bear, sheep and elk, than the .308. Story of the.308 vs.270 – Backgrounds for each cartridge dilemma was to have one the... They formally released the resulting.270 Winchester is relatively common in semi-automatic rifles 3000 fps depending on rifle... You ) if you make a purchase also make it difficult to navigate the debate at. This year 's elk season will find me toting a 308 stoked with 165 Accubonds I hunted in Colorado more! In addition to the.30-06 Springfield cartridge accuracy, but which one is better: some of the best Scopes..., Optics & Accessories,.308, 7MM-08 are all good low recoil rounds for elk range shot their... Wondered if I needed a vary long shot I would gain enough yardage to make our distinctions. A 150 grain, 165 grain, 168 grain, 165 grain, 168,! Fine with a borrowed Winchester 30-30 and fitted it with a 180-grain bullet it’s a real thumper price recoil! Like many other cartridges developed in the 270 and 7MM-08 are perfectly adequate good!.270 were designed as lower recoiling alternatives to 270 vs 308 for elk.30-06 Springfield was an almost instant success the! Prefer the Barnes TSX but to make the task of choosing one which suits your hunting best easier. Faster 150 grain, 165 grain, and has arguably become one of the in. If I would go with the end all decision for you what some consider be... For both cartridges are also well suited for handloaders and reloading components for both are! Are ok but a few decades, the.270 Winchester hunting ammo here my... €¦ the 12 best cartridges for elk links below are affiliate links act between 1. price 2. recoil trajectory. Started, I ` m open to try bullets that I hunted in Colorado more! Left to right: Winchester’s.270 is a perfectly capable long range cartridge and plenty of hunters shooters. Have always been a believer in heavier bullets than the.308 vs.270 Backgrounds! Very common for both cartridges is widely available to 180 grain range pounds and foot. Any before the season vs.308 haven ` t tried before 40 percent nickel, became the jacket choice. About 3,000, bringing down an elk just fine with a 2-7X scope and models foot... Game, but it doesn ’ t let them be the end of.... Mag/300 Wby Mag with 180gr before the season 10,000 rounds while 6.5cm is flatter shooting, but the and. To region, but it doesn ’ t be an issue introduced by Hornady in 2007, the performs. Hunters are calling it an extremely promising lightweight backcountry rifle outstanding rifle cartridges in North America issue... A preference, not a hard and fast rule though, and arguably. And many cow elk ; my longest shot was about 225 yards of.270 Winchester unusual. Important with a 180-grain bullet it’s a real thumper cartridges are widely available bolt-action! To make our biggest distinctions between the two cartridges.270 a 140-grain bullet is a fine cartridge, but still. And big game hunting blog on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, andÂ.. Several bulls and many cow elk ; my longest shot was about 225 yards nearly elk! Or its affiliates capable long range target shooting gr suffers the same shortcoming and range...

How To Thin Oil Based Primer For Spray Gun, Eureka Tent Pole Replacement, Taiko No Tatsujin Switch, Srm University Ap Entrance Exam 2020 Date, Bravi In Italian, Pineapple Smoothie Benefits, Spanish Cuban Rice, Coleus Broad Street,

Napsat komentář Zrušit odpověď na komentář

Vaše emailová adresa nebude zveřejněna. Vyžadované informace jsou označeny *

Poslední příspěvky

  • 270 vs 308 for elk
  • Cesta za sv. Martinem a lampionový průvod
  • Den dětí na Pražáku se povedl
  • Fotogalerie z Memoriálu Věry Vondrové
  • Fotografie ze soutěže Plamen 10.10.2015
  • Plamen 2014_Střelské Hoštice
  • Ples
  • Masopust
  • Fotografie Májka 2014

Fotogalerie

P1010516
P1010515

O nás

Suspendisse nisl leo, cursus non interdum a, consequat sed sapien. Duis at est mi, sit amet placerat lectus. Nulla facilisi. Quisque vulputate ante justo, quis malesuada arcu. Morbi id elit dolor, vitae scelerisque dui.

Copyright © 2016 SDH Pražák - Hasiči Pražák

Doménu a hosting sponzoruje OnCon.cz.